Commentary: As Silent Spring's 50th anniversary nears, what would Rachel Carson be saying now?
Many people have the impression that climate disruption is
the worst environmental problem humanity faces, and indeed, its
consequences may be catastrophic. But the spread of toxic chemicals from
pole to pole may be the dark horse in the race. We could just pursue
business as usual and count on luck to save civilization. Maybe no truly
lethal synergies will turn up, or no new chemical will become global
before it is discovered to cause cancer. Maybe the poisonings will not
collapse ecological systems and bring down civilization. Perhaps
advances in molecular biology will neutralize any dangerous new
chemicals or cure any serious diseases that appear. And perhaps they
won’t. Is it wise to sit by and not take substantial measures? In
democracies, the decision rests ultimately with the citizens; I think it
is crystal clear what Rachel Carson, author of the 1962 book Silent
Spring, would have recommended.
http://www.environmentalhealthnews.org/ehs/news/2012/commentary-paul-ehrlich-on-rachel-carson